UPDATED: 10-13-25 17:46 PDT

cfp UTSA 1
  
UTSA                  
W-L: ( 6- 6) PR = 90.2965

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 831 H Kennesaw St CUSA ( 2-10, 84.0) 28-16 907 A Texas State SUN ( 7- 5, 91.5) 10-49 914 A Texas SEC (11- 2, 97.9) 7-56 921 H Houston Chr 45- 7 928 A Ea Carolina American ( 7- 5, 90.6) 20-30 1012 A Rice American ( 4- 8, 89.0) 27-29 1019 H Fla Atlantic American ( 3- 9, 86.5) 38-24 1026 A Tulsa American ( 3- 9, 85.6) 45-46 1102 H Memphis American (10- 2, 93.3) 44-36 1115 H No Texas American ( 6- 6, 90.2) 48-27 1122 H Temple American ( 3- 9, 87.5) 51-27 1130 A Army American (11- 1, 95.6) 24-29

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   831 H Kennesaw St            28-16      12     7           0.00
   907 A Texas State            10-49     -39    -2    -     -2.93
   914 A Texas                   7-56     -49    -9           0.00
   928 A Ea Carolina            20-30     -10    -1    -     -3.79
  1012 A Rice                   27-29      -2     0    -     -2.39
  1019 H Fla Atlantic           38-24      14     5           0.33
  1026 A Tulsa                  45-46      -1     4    --    -4.78
  1102 H Memphis                44-36       8    -2    +++    7.10
  1115 H No Texas               48-27      21     1    ++     4.03
  1122 H Temple                 51-27      24     4           1.26
  1130 A Army                   24-29      -5    -6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1026 A Tulsa                  45-46      -1     4    --    -4.78
   907 A Texas State            10-49     -39    -2    -     -2.93
   928 A Ea Carolina            20-30     -10    -1    -     -3.79
  1012 A Rice                   27-29      -2     0    -     -2.39

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1102 H Memphis                44-36       8    -2    +++    7.10
  1115 H No Texas               48-27      21     1    ++     4.03

UTSA Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col ` Boston Col `   Boston Col `
California California   California
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UTSA
Georgia Tech Georgia Tech   Georgia Tech
Louisville Louisville   Louisville
Miami Miami   Miami
UNC UNC   UNC
NC St NC St   NC St
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh   Pittsburgh
SMU SMU   SMU
Stanford Stanford   Stanford
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
Va Tech Va Tech   Va Tech
Wake Forest Wake Forest   Wake Forest
Army Army Army  
Charlotte UTSA insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) UTSA
Ea Carolina Ea Carolina Ea Carolina  
Fla Atlantic UTSA UTSA  
Memphis UTSA UTSA  
Navy Navy insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Navy
No Texas UTSA UTSA  
Rice Rice Rice  
So Florida UTSA tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) UTSA
Temple UTSA UTSA  
Tulane Tulane tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) Tulane
Tulsa Tulsa Tulsa  
UAB UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) UTSA
Arizona Arizona   Arizona
Arizona St Arizona St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Arizona St
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Baylor   Baylor
Cincinnati Cincinnati   Cincinnati
Colorado Colorado   Colorado
Houston Houston insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Houston
Iowa St Iowa St   Iowa St
Kansas Kansas   Kansas
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Oklahoma St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Oklahoma St
TCU TCU   TCU
Texas Tech Texas Tech tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Texas Tech
UCF UCF   UCF
Utah Utah   Utah
We Virginia We Virginia   We Virginia
Illinois Illinois   Illinois
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
Michigan Michigan tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Michigan
Michigan St Michigan St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Michigan St
Minnesota Minnesota   Minnesota
Nebraska Nebraska   Nebraska
Northwestern Northwestern   Northwestern
Ohio St Ohio St   Ohio St
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Purdue UTSA   UTSA
Rutgers Rutgers   Rutgers
UCLA UCLA   UCLA
USC USC   USC
Washington Washington   Washington
Wisconsin Wisconsin   Wisconsin
Florida Intl UTSA UTSA   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Jacksonv. St UTSA tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UTSA
Kennesaw St UTSA UTSA  
Liberty UTSA tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) UTSA
La Tech UTSA tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) UTSA
Middle Tenn UTSA insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) UTSA
NM St UTSA   UTSA
SHouston St SHouston St SHouston St   3- 0 vs 1- 2
UTEP UTSA tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UTSA
We Kentucky UTSA tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UTSA
UMass UTSA   UTSA
Notre Dame Notre Dame insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Notre Dame
UConn UConn insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) UConn
Akron UTSA   UTSA
Ball St UTSA   UTSA
Bowl. Green UTSA   UTSA
Buffalo UTSA   UTSA
Cen Michigan UTSA   UTSA
Ea Michigan UTSA   UTSA
Kent State UTSA   UTSA
MiamiOH MiamiOH   MiamiOH
No Illinois UTSA   UTSA
Ohio Ohio   Ohio
Toledo UTSA   UTSA
We Michigan UTSA   UTSA
Air Force UTSA tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) UTSA
Boise State Boise State   Boise State
Colorado St Colorado St tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Colorado St
Fresno St Fresno St   Fresno St
Hawaii UTSA   UTSA
Nevada UTSA   UTSA
New Mexico UTSA   UTSA
San Diego St UTSA   UTSA
San Jose St San Jose St tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) San Jose St
UNLV UNLV   UNLV
Utah St UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UTSA
Wyoming UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UTSA
Oregon St UTSA   UTSA
Wash St Wash St   Wash St
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas Arkansas tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Arkansas
Auburn Auburn   Auburn
Florida Florida tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Florida
Georgia Georgia insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Georgia
Kentucky Kentucky tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kentucky
LSU LSU   LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss St UTSA tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) UTSA
Oklahoma Oklahoma tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So Carolina So Carolina   So Carolina
Tennessee Tennessee   Tennessee
Texas Texas Texas  
Texas A&M Texas A&M tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Vanderbilt
App St App St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) App St
Arkansas State UTSA insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) UTSA
Coastal Car Coastal Car tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coastal Car
Georgia So Georgia So   Georgia So
Georgia St UTSA insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) UTSA
J Madison J Madison   J Madison
Louisiana Louisiana insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Louisiana
Marshall Marshall   Marshall
Old Dominion Old Dominion insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Old Dominion
So Miss UTSA tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) UTSA
So Alabama So Alabama insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) So Alabama
Texas State Texas State Texas State  
Troy UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) UTSA
La-Monroe UTSA tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) UTSA

PowerWise = 43


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.10

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Kennesaw St     ( 2-10, 84.0)    28-16      -15.86       2.40      -0.91         1.10             1.64
   0 A Texas State     ( 7- 5, 91.5)    10-49       -8.44       9.82       0.91         1.10            -8.29
   0 A Texas           (11- 2, 97.9)     7-56       -2.01      16.25       0.91         1.10            -1.21
   0 A Ea Carolina     ( 7- 5, 90.6)    20-30       -9.30       8.96       0.91         1.10            -9.24
   0 A Rice            ( 4- 8, 89.0)    27-29      -10.90       7.36       0.91         1.10           -11.00
   0 H Fla Atlantic    ( 3- 9, 86.5)    38-24      -13.37       4.89      -0.91         1.10             4.38
   0 A Tulsa           ( 3- 9, 85.6)    45-46      -14.28       3.97       0.91         1.10           -14.72
   0 H Memphis         (10- 2, 93.3)    44-36       -6.60      11.65      -0.91         1.10            11.83
   0 H No Texas        ( 6- 6, 90.2)    48-27       -9.67       8.59      -0.91         1.10             8.45
   0 H Temple          ( 3- 9, 87.5)    51-27      -12.44       5.82      -0.91         1.10             5.41
   0 A Army            (11- 1, 95.6)    24-29       -4.34      13.92       0.91         1.10            -3.78
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -16.53

winning pts = 31.7077 losing points = -48.2416

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------